| |
|
THE
CONCERT REPORT
Concert reports should be,
on average, two to three pages, double-spaced. No citation is necessary.
While
you may include information learned from program notes, do NOT quote huge sections
at length in order to 'pad' your report. Honest effort at engaging the
music on an intellectual and emotional level is all I'm looking for.
The
Concert as a Whole
Begin
your report with a brief description of the concert, including the name
and type of the performing group or soloists and the music you heard. Describe
your general reaction to the concert.
Individual
Compositions
Go into as much detail as possible on one
piece or movement,
mentioning all the other works in at least one descriptive sentence.
Suggestions:
Musical styles. How did the composition correspond
to what you know about the musical style period in which it was composed--baroque,
classical, romantic, etc.? Your appreciation of a work is often enhanced when
you recognize its musical style. - Musical
genres. What was the genre of the piece? (Piano Concerto, Symphony, etc.).
What musical forms were employed--theme and variations, sonata form, ABA, etc.?
- Memorable
features. What features of the piece were most memorable--for example,
did you tend to remember slower, lyrical sections; or triumphant parts; or fast,
exciting parts? Were there any striking melodies and rhythms? Were there any unusual
vocal, instrumental, or electronic effects?
- Musical
themes. Were there several contrasting sections or themes within a movement?
Did you recognize variations of particular themes (development) or reappearances
of musical ideas in different sections or movements?
- Overall
Destiny. How easy was it to follow the 'destiny' of the
work's themes or melodies? What was "time's effect on the material?"
- Emotions,
images, and ideas. Did the composition evoke in you specific feelings or
thoughts? Describe how the music depicted mood, character, drama. Tell how they
relate to the form of the piece or movement.
Comparisons with other works. It is often illuminating
to compare a work with other works on the program, or with other works
you have studied, noting similarities and differences. - Performance
Your discussion of performance will be more subjective:
Emotional projection. Did you think that the performer(s) succeeded in
projecting the emotional meaning of the work? - Virtuosity.
How difficult (in terms of performance) did the music sound to you?
- Personal
interpretation. Did the artist inject
his or her personality into the performance, or did it seem to you to be a more
'respectful' approach (in other words, was it more about the music, or
about the performer?)
| | | | |
| | |